Tonight I watched "Starting Out in the Evening," an interesting movie that explores passion, freedom, and what seems to be turning into the lost art of appreciation for the written word. This movie was so complex that I found myself getting lost in all the layers of meaning and symbolism, but in the greatest way. The only thing I didn't like about it was the subplot about the main character's daughter and her boyfriend. Otherwise, a phenomenal movie. Lauren Ambrose plays "Heather Wolfe," a graduate student who is in awe of her literary hero ("Leonard Schiller") and seeks him out in hopes he will participate in contributing to her master's thesis: a closer look at the man behind the older, more famous novels from years ago. Schiller has been working on the same novel for 10 years prior to Heather showing up at his door, his life seemingly as stale as his current writing project. Though the age difference between the two creates awkward and uncomfortable moments for both characters at times, they still manage to challenge each other's intellectual acumen and emotional vulnerabilities. It's done in such a way that isn't contrived, but genuine with refreshingly honest dialogue to match.I could appreciate this film because it seemed to combine and explore two of my favorite passions in life, psychology/reflection and writing. I found myself identifying with bits and pieces of both Ambrose' character, as well as Schiller and Schiller's daughter. Usually I only tend to identify with characters in books because the character development is lacking the substantial depth to really get into a character's mind and heart.
But I could empathize with those in "Starting Out in the Evening" because they mirrored parts of myself here and there:
Heather Wolfe's desire for both a cerebral and emotional connection ("Men my age are like chewing gum; ten minutes of flavor, and then just bland repetition.")
Leonard Schiller's passion (and muse) for writing that gives meaning to his life and the conflicts he battles within himself to live his convictions ("Freedom isn't the choice the world encourages. You have to wear a suit of armor to defend it. ")
And even though the subplot juxtaposed with the main plot could have either been done better or not done at all, I liked how Schiller's 40 year old daughter Ariel attempts to make changes to her dysfunctional relationship patterns.
The character development isn't the only thing that separates this movie from others similar to its kind out there. The overall theme of the film honors the power of the written word--- the thoughts, feelings, and impact writers have on those who loyally read and appreciate the message. To read a novel/intimate writing...is like soaking up someone's innermost self like a sponge and yet, you always want more. Or at least that is my hope. Schiller even says something I have wondered myself. Heather asks him if he's concerned whether people will still be reading his novel in 100 years. His concern is whether people will even be reading novels in 100 years. Sadly, therein his statement is truth of the times. For now though, I'd just like to be inspired by this movie's story.







