Writing this blog will probably stir more questions than answers, but I'm going to write about it nonetheless since it's an interesting topic on my mind today.What is the statute of limitations on shame, remorse, and forgiveness vs. forget on something most people would consider morally wrong? Does it depend on whether the heinous actions have affected a small scale or a large scale of humanity? (ie, "a threat to one is a threat to all mentality)
If someone has put in the sincere and honest effort towards behavioral rehabilitation and overall positive changes within oneself, is that what should be the determining factor? How do we really know for sure if he/she IS honest and sincere? And is it really up to us humans to decide or that of one's personal god(s), karma, spirituality and/or ethics,etc. specific to the individual who has committed the morally reprehensible crime? Do we give someone the benefit of the doubt or do we never trust them (or at least quite the same) again?
Here's what made me think of all this.....
The past few years I have been working with a man who has been consistently sober, but continues to struggle with a bad choice he made under the influence of drugs: sexually molesting a minor, hence permanently deeming him with the scarlet letter of 'Sex Offender,' a virtual lifelong 'prison sentence' if you will.
As I have talked with him extensively about it over the course of the past two years, I know that he has successfully completed his time in prison, including a 6 month rehabilitation program while there. His treatment in prison consisted of 'shaming,' a cognitive-behavioral interventions that has the offender write down the offense committed on a chalkboard for all to see. The offender must then ACT OUT what he did in front of treatment therapists and other fellow sexual offenders in a group setting.
I have learned quite a bit about the thoughts and feelings experienced by a recovering sex offender by frequently talking candidly and in depth with this individual about it. While I do not know for sure if he has reoffended (because I only know what he's like in our sessions), my overall intuition gives me a strong feeling that he has honestly rehabilitated himself. Perhaps he represents a small percentage of nonrecidivism, I don't know, but this is such a difficult issue to address in society. A cut and dry solution doesn't seem like a solution.
How does one balance the overall concern for the community without alienating the constitutional rights of the individual...especially if he/she hasn't given justifiable reason to be treated as if still committing crimes?
I asked him if he thinks he will ever reach a point in his life where he won't be reminded every day of this one particular bad decision he made and commended him for his strength to cope with such judgment and harrassment from various sectors in the community (ie, he receives harrassing phone calls once a week from an unknown caller, forcing him to have the number blocked,etc). He told me that he hopes one day he will not have to be reminded of it and that it helps having people (like me) who support him through his continual treatment services.
It truly is a Catch 22. I'm not one to condone when a 'wrong' has been done, but at the same time, if someone shows true remorse and a willingness to change, who are we to say he/she cannot be a different person and make choices that will be more positive? Hmmmm. All I know is that I don't ever want to become so pessimistic that I feel myself giving up on the virtues of humanity. On the other hand, I don't want to be nieve either.
Keeping a fine balance between compassion and judgment is one of the hardest things to do....







